Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona & Its Corporate Chapter, Arizona Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Neely
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 14, 1992No. CIV 89-489 TUC ACMPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARQUEZ, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs originally brought this civil rights and declaratory action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the United States Constitution and the Arizona Constitution, challenging Arizona Revised Statutes § 36-2152 and § 36-2153 on their face and seeking declaratory judgment that the statutes are unconstitutional and permanent injunctive relief against the enforcement of said statutes.
Defendant Stephen D. Neely filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on July 8, 1992, asserting that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Manning v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. VoinovichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- Manning v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona, Inc. v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.