Legal Opinion

Chelsea L. Harrison Keesler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the Plan v. Tractor Supply Company

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00715Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHELSEA L. HARRISON KEESLER, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, and on behalf of the ) Plan, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 3:25-cv-00715 v. ) ) TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Tractor Supply Company’s (“Tractor Supply”) motion to dismiss, which is ripe for review. (Doc. Nos. 67, 68, 71, 77). For the following reasons, the motion will be denied. I. Background1 Chelsea Harrison Keesler was a fulltime employee of Tractor Supply in Pennsylvania. (Doc.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Gentek Building Products, Inc., Steel Peel Litigation Trust, Formerly Known as Sherwin-Williams Claims Trust v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Alan Cartwright v. Alan GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. John Doe v. David BaumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API