Legal Opinion

Patriotic Veterans, Incorporat v. State of Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 3, 2017No. 16-2059PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, a veterans’ group, contends that an anti-robocall statute, Ind. Code § 24-5-14-5, violates the First Amendment to the Constitution, applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, which contains a similar limit, has been sustained by two circuits. See Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald, Co., 768 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2014), affirmed on other grounds, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 663, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016); Van Bergen v. Minnesota, 59 F.3d 1541, 1549-56 (8th Cir. 1995); Moser v. FCC, 46 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 1995). The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Richard T. Van Bergen v. State of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sebastian Cordoba v. DIRECTV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Noah Duguid v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Josephine Havlak Photographer, Inc. v. Village of Twin OaksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Brickman v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Gallion v. Charter Commc'ns Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API