Legal Opinion

Honsinger v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1982No. 5622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case started as a quiet title action brought against the state in 1973. Plaintiffs are the owners of homestead lands in the Mendenhall Wetlands area northwest of Juneau. Between the time of the original federal homestead patent surveys and 1973, approximately 95 acres of land had emerged contiguous to the seaward side of plaintiffs’ property.

Plaintiffs claimed that the property in dispute was created by accretion and, therefore, should inure to their benefit as littoral, i.e. shoreline, owners. The state responded that all or a portion of the land in question was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bonelli Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Schafer v. SchnabelAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Ziemba v. ZellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pankratz v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Vernon Fiehler v. T. Anthony Mecklenburg, Catherine Mecklenburg, State of Alaska, City & Borough of Juneau, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. City of Saint Paul v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API