The People of the State of New York v. James Horelick and Sandra Adickes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal from an order of remand by the District Court for the Southern District of New York, we again have the task of interpreting the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443, in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 86 S.Ct. 1783, 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (1966), upholding removal, and City of Greenwood, Miss. v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (1966), denying it. 1 This case plainly falls on the Peacock side.
Petitioners sought removal of five prosecutions in the Criminal Court of the City of New York.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kentucky v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Snead v. KirklandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- People v. HeidelbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Reverend John M. Perkins v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- People of State of NY v. MukaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.