Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Snead v. Kirkland
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-2661PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
On July 21,1978, Arthur Snead, a federal prisoner incarcerated at Lewisburg Penitentiary, instituted this pro se action 1 by filing three documents entitled: (1) “Action for Mandamus to Show Cause Why Frame-up Bank Robbery Conviction Should Not Be Vacated, Set Aside and Dismissed with Prejudice Against Renewal”, (2) “Complaint and Petition For Order To Show Cause”, and (3) “Special Declaration of Complete and Total Innocence”. 2 The named plaintiffs are Arthur, Daniel and Darryl Snead but Arthur was the only plaintiff who signed the pleadings. 3 The suit…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Knoblauch v. KenyonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lutz v. LavelleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Brown v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Green v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Alberici v. TinariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.