Legal Opinion
Miller Et Ux. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1951No. 13283_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The United States instituted suit in the trial Court expressly predicated upon the provisions of section 205 (a) as amended of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 1 and sections 205, 206(b) and 206(c) of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 2 and the alleged receiving by the defendants of rents in excess of the maximum legal rent on specified housing accommodations in the Dallas, Texas, defense rental area from specified tenants. Averring the failure of the tenants to bring suit for the recovery of such overcharges within thirty' days, the United States…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowles v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Moore Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- United States v. GianoulisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Moore Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Beatty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Mattox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.