Legal Opinion
Mattox v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1951No. 12558_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit by the United States for an •'injunction and restitution and for treble •damages under § 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1895. It was filed May 9, 1949, and with the court’s permission' an ¡amended complaint was filed September 6 thereafter. Upon .trial the court found that the defendants had demanded and received from tenants amounts in the total sum of $6,761.80 in excess of the legal maximum rents. It granted an injunction and decreed restitution to tenants of the excess rentals collected, but did not award…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Woods v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Fontes v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Penn Jersey Welding Co. v. Lowe, Deputy CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. GianoulisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beatty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Ziomek and 10 Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. LesniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.