Legal Opinion
Moore Et Ux. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1950No. 13031PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The United States, through' the Housing Expediter, brought this action on June 29, 1949, for damages, injunction against further violation, and for" restitution, of rent overcharges, pursuant to Sections 205, 206 (a), and 206(b), of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq. However, prior to the filing of this suit, the Housing Expediter, in conformity with action taken by the City of Dallas under Section 204 (j) (3) of the Act, had terminated rent control in that city. Based upon such abolition of rent control, appellants moved to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Clayton v. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Ex Parte Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Moore Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Dabney v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.