Otero Savings and Loan Association, a Colorado Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
I
LOGAN, Circuit Judge:
THE LEGALITY OF OTERO’S CHECK-IN PROGRAM UNDER 12 U.S.C. § 1832
Because its accounts are insured by the FSLIC, Otero is deemed an “insured institution” within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. § 1724, and is therefore a “depository institution” by definition under 12 U.S.C. § 1832(b)(5). As such, Otero is subject to § 1832(a), which provides:(a) No depository institution shall allow the owner of a deposit or account on which interest or dividends are paid to make withdrawals by negotiable or transferable instruments for the purpose of *282making transfers to third parties, except that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Otero Savings And Loan Association v. Federal Reserve Bank Of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Otero Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Berniece Larimore, Sam M. Taylor, William G. Butcher, and Orville Bottrell v. Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KidwellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Citizens State Bank Of Marshfield, Missouri v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.