Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Ervolina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—■ Order as to ordering paragraphs fifth, eighth, and ninth affirmed; otherwise order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice granted and plaintiff directed to serve an amended complaint within twenty days, omitting all objectionable matter, upon payment of $10 costs and the costs of this appeal. Memorandum: The complaint as a whole offends every rule of good pleading and calls for the application of our decision in Isaacs V. Washougal Clothing Go. (233 App. Div. 568, 572), “ The purpose of pleadings is to present and define the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Welsh v. Cowles Shipyard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Punia v. Dry Dock Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weissglass v. WeissglassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Bess v. Ghana Philatelic Agency, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In re the Intermediate Accounting of SutterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  4. Lawrence v. TalbotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API