Legal Opinion

In re the Intermediate Accounting of Sutter

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 18, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John C. Boylan, S.

This is a motion to strike out the objections of one of the chief beneficiaries named in the will.

During the many conferences had in this matter, the parties were advised repeatedly by the court that before framing objections, the draftsman should first become thoroughly familiar with the terms of the will, sections 49 and 210 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, and then proceed accordingly. Unfortunately, the draftsman of the objections now before the court, paid little heed to our advice.

The purpose of pleadings is to present and define the issues to be tried and determined, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Joseph v. ErvolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. TalbotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API