Legal Opinion

United States v. Morrow

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 25, 1982No. 81 0965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADIS, Judge:

At a general court-martial bench trial appellant pled and was found guilty of four specifications of larceny, one specification of housebreaking, and one specification of unauthorized absence, violations of Articles 121, 130, and 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 930, 886, respectively. Appellant was sentenced to fifteen months confinement at hard labor, total forfeitures, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge. Al*555though a pretrial agreement had been negotiated, none of the sentence limiting provisions were operable. Consequently,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. HaglerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. WagerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ZammitU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. MorrowUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API