Bird v. State

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Chester Bird (Bird) appeals a district court denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence based on his contention that the prior convictions underlying his habitual *431criminal conviction were constitutionally infirm, We find that Bird's claim was not proper under W.R.Cr.P. 35(a) and dismiss the appeal.

[T2] In his pro se brief Bird raises one issue on appeal:

Did the trial court err in ruling that appellant's prior convictions were constitutional?

The State substantially agrees with Bird's characterization of the issue:

Did the district court err in denying the "motion to…