Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1967No. 40745PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is Burglary; the punishment, seven (7) years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Appellant initially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction as a principal.

On the evening of August 15, 1966, Officers Means and Badalmenti, two Fort Worth City policemen, in response to an anonymous telephone call, went at approximately 9:45 p. m. to 3016 East 4th Street in Fort Worth, the home office building of the Great Court Heroines of Jericho. Upon arrival, Officer Means went to the west side and Officer Badalmenti went to the east…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Preston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Fisk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Gibbs Ex Rel. Gibbs v. WilmethSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. State v. EverettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API