Legal Opinion

People v. Field

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 40,382PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendant Field was allowed an appeal from a sentence imposed after his conviction by a jury of the crime of embezzlement. He was charged with violation of the provisions of Act No. 328, § 174, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1935, §17115-174, Stat. Ann. §28.371). See 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 16980. This section reads:

“Any person who as the agent, servant or employee of another, or as the trustee, bailee or custodian of the property of another, or of any partnership, voluntary association, public or private corporation, or of this State, or of any county, city, village, township or school…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hitchcock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. HoepleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Crippen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HackettMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. People v. MeierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API