Legal Opinion

People v. Hackett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1985No. Docket Nos. 67291, 69249. (Calendar Nos. 2, 3)PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344Boyle, J.

We granted leave to consider the constitutionality of the rape-shield statute, MCL 750.520j; MSA 28.788(10), as applied in these two cases. We hold that application of the statute in the cases at bar did not violate defendant’s procedural or substantive rights. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Paquette and reverse in Hackett.

I

Defendants in both cases challenge the trial court’s application of the rape-shield statute, MCL 750.520j(1); MSA 28.788(10)(1), in excluding evidence of the victim’s prior sexual conduct with persons other than the defendant as violative of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. BentonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. DuenazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API