Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Case for slander. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action for slander arising in White Lake, Oakland county, and tried in the circuit court for that-county. Verdict and judgment went for the defendant.

It was charged in the declaration that the defendant had wrongfully accused, in various words and ways, the plaintiff' of burning defendant’s barn in August, 1886.

The plea was the general issue.

We shall consider the errors assigned in the order in which they were argued before us

First. Upon the cross-examination of the plaintiff he was-asked questions concerning his treatment of his wife, who was. a daughter of the defendant, and if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gough v. St. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Bennett v. HydeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  4. Miles v. VanhornIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Stow v. ConverseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1820

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cooper v. PhippsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Hagerman v. WigentMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API