Legal Opinion
Carolina Lanes, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1967No. Civ. 31150PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
This is an action by plaintiffs Carolina Lanes, Inc., and Carolina Enterprises, Inc., for declaratory relief and an injunction restraining respondents City of Los Angeles, board of police commissioners, and chief of police, from enforcing rules of the board regulating burlesque and strip-tease entertainment. The court determined that the rules are constitutional. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
Appellant contends that the rules are unconstitutional in that (1) the regulation of burlesque and strip-tease entertainment has been preempted by state legislation, (2) the rules deprive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Robins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- In Re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Daniel v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Los Angeles v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. StephensonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.