Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colon v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1985Published

1DissentTitone, J.

I cannot accept the notion that an insurance carrier is obligated to provide a defense to a stranger simply because the plaintiff alleges facts which, if true, would bring the stranger within the ambit of an omnibus clause providing coverage for persons operating a vehicle with its policyholder’s permission. Therefore, I am compelled to dissent.

At the outset, the background facts deserve some emphasis. Plaintiff, Michael L. Colon, was involved in an automobile collision on December 4, 1977, resulting in the death of another driver. At the time, he was operating a vehicle owned by Palmier Oil…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API