Legal Opinion

Mayor of Holyoke v. Board of Aldermen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The basic question in this case is whether the board of aldermen of the city of Holyoke has lawfully appropriated for school purposes during the 1981 fiscal year an amount in excess of the amount that, but for such an appropriation, could be available for school purposes under the so called “tax cap” legislation. St. 1979, c. 151.

The Holyoke school committee, as a “governing body” defined in St. 1979, c. 151, § 2, had no general authority to *709approve a budget for fiscal year 1981 “which [was] greater than [104%] of the budget approved by [it] for the preceding fiscal . . . year.” St. 1979, c.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Decatur v. Auditor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Ring v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Hayes v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Casey v. City of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boston Teachers Union, Local 66 v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Superintendent of Schools v. Mayor of LeominsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Whalen v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Quincy Education Ass'n v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API