Legal Opinion

Kingsland v. Leonard

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Larremore J.

After examination of the judgment-roll of Leonard agt. Kingsland, in the court of common pleas, I am satisfied that the plea o*f res adjudicóla cannot prevail, and that the decision in this case must depend upon the construction of the following clauses of the will of Daniel Kingsland, the elder: “ All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, I give, devise and bequeath unto my son Daniel Kingsland and to his heirs; but in case my son Daniel should die without lawful issue, I give and bequeath it to my remaining children share and share alike.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Miller v. . EmansNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Wylie v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Accounting of MulliganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API