Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Mulligan

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 15, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

Testatrix gave certain cash legacies to each of her sisters (and one cousin) and other specific or residual legacies to each of her brothers. In the gifts to all but one of the male members she provided “ if he do [sic] not survive me, then to his children, share and share alike.” One of the brothers who predeceased the testatrix left him surviving no children, but three grandchildren, born of a child who died prior to both the legatee and the testatrix. The court is asked to construe the word ‘‘ children ’ ’ and to determine whether it shall be held to include “…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Palmer v. . HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Mowatt v. CarowNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  5. Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Wilson's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. In re the Estate of VillalongaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re the Estate of BarnumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  4. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. City of New York v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API