Legal Opinion

United States v. Ewell

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 21, 2003No. 00-697 GEBPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BROWN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon defendant Carlton Ewell’s motion for a new trial regarding the Court’s admission of the Government’s DNA evidence at trial. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion is denied and the following findings and conclusions shall hereby supplement the Court’s November 15, 2002 Order denying the defendants’ motion to suppress the Government’s DNA evidence and granting the Government’s motion to admit the DNA evidence.

I. FACTS 1

On April 25, April 26, and August 13, 2002, the Court held a Daubert 2 hearing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. United States v. MorrowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. State v. J.D.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. United States v. McCluskeyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  5. State v. Fernando-GranadosNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API