Legal Opinion
Stryker v. Department of Employment Security
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 6, 1976No. 239-74PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
Because this unemployment compensation claimant restricted herself to part-time employment, the Board refused her claim. The basis of that decision was a determination that she was unavailable for work in terms of 21 V.S.A. § 1348 (a) (3). The issue is now here.
This is not a case where the claimant refused proffered employment of any kind. Further, the presence of a substantial amount of part-time employment in the area is not seriously disputed. The Board itself, in its findings, altered the emphasis of the referee’s findings in that connection, but the evidence clearly sustains the presence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Nurmi v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Willard v. Vermont Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Robinson v. Maryland Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Skudlarek v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Jenkins v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Louis F. LaFountain v. Department of Labor (Eden General Store, Inc., Employer)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.