Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 1978No. 12756PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
Petitioner in this case appeals from a determination that she was ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. Her pro se brief is little more than a series of unsupported charges. We affirm, with the following cautionary remarks.
Petitioner was a recipient of unemployment compensation benefits for some six months. On August 17, 1977, she had a routine interview intended to determine continuing eligibility. At that time, a claims deputy verified the fact that petitioner had searched for work during the previous weeks, but learned that petitioner would be unwilling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Myers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board and John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Lucy Arlene Thomas. National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Laura H. Dorsey. National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Harper v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Barber v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Beck v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978