Legal Opinion

City of Tallapoosa v. Brock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 19, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. May 13, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. In bringing suit against a municipal corporation for damages on account of a personal injury, it is necessary to allege a substantial compliance with the Civil Code, § 910, which requires a presentation in writing of such claim to the governing authority of the municipality/for adjustment, stating the time, place, etc., before bringing suit, and allows the municipal authorities thirty days in which to act on the claim. A petition which fails to do this is demurrable. Saunders v. City of Fitzgerald, 113 Ga. 619 (38 S. E. 978); City of Columbus v. McDaniel, 117 Ga. 823 (45 S. E. 59); Langley…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Saunders v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. City of Columbus v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Jones v. City Council of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Allen v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. City of Rome v. RigdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. City of Lafayette v. RosserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API