Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Rigdon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1941No. 13773PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The questions for consideration relate exclusively to bar by the statute of limitations of an action against a municipal corporation, for damages caused by injury to the person. It is declared in the Code, § 3-1004: “Actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues.” This law was in force at the time of the passage of the act approved December 20, 1899, which now appears in the Code, § 69-308, and was the only applicable statute of limitations for injuries to the person. The act of 1899 stated: “No person, . .…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Peterson v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Saunders v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Maryon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Mayor of Unadilla v. FelderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colby v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Chamblee v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Schaefer v. Mayor &C. of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. O'Neal v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Vickers v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API