Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Inasmuch as a municipality is not, since the passage of the act of December 20, 1899, subject to suit on a claim of the character therein mentioned until after the same has been duly presented in writing to the municipal authorities for adjustment, it is imperative that one instituting an action to enforce the payment of such a claim shall in his petition affirmatively allege full compliance with the requirements of that act. Saunders v. Fitzgerald, 113 Ga. 619. But the plaintiff is under no obligation to encumber his pleadings by setting forth in his petition, or attaching thereto as an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saunders v. City of FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flemister v. Central Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. City Council of Augusta v. MarksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Fulton County v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Fulton County v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API