Legal Opinion

Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 29, 1986No. 84 Civ. 5267 (PKL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEISURE, District Judge:

In Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co., 632 F.Supp. 1213 (S.D.N.Y.1986), this Court ordered that it would grant plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment declaring that defendant Commercial Union Insurance Company (“CU”) has a duty to defend plaintiff Burroughs Wellcome Co. (“Burroughs”) against all lawsuits and claims arising directly or derivatively from alleged exposure to DES. Entry of judgment was stayed, however, in order to permit CU to inspect the files of Johnson & Higgins, Burroughs’ insurance broker, at pertinent locations, and then…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huang v. Sentinel Government SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. Sutton Hill Associates v. LandesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. United Technologies Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API