Legal Opinion
Sutton Hill Associates v. Landes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1989No. 87 Civ. 8452 (PKL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This motion involves the contested right to possession of two valuable East Side Manhattan cinema properties, the Sutton Theatre (“Sutton”) and the Murray Hill Theatre (“Murray Hill,” collectively the “Theatres”). Plaintiff seeks partial sum mary judgment granting the declaratory relief sought in its complaint and reply to counterclaims, as well as dismissal of the defendants’ defenses and counterclaims that relate to possession of the Theatres. 1
Defendants were tenant leaseholders of the Theatres. The lease expired by its terms on August 15, 1988.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- International Minerals & Resources, Inc. v. PappasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Sugar Creek Stores, Inc. v. PittsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Dorinco Reinsurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990