Legal Opinion
New England Power Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 24, 1982No. 82-1317PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
This case involves the implementation by the Interstate Commerce Commission (“the Commission”) of § 229 of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980. 1 We review the Commission’s decision in Ex Parte No. 411, Complaints Filed Under Section 229 of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, 365 I.C.C. 507 (1982), that its most recently promulgated market dominance standards shall apply to savings clause cases under that section. We affirm.
I. Background
Prior to the Railroad Revitalization and Reform Act of 1976 (“the Reform Act”), 2 all rail rates were subject to regulation by the Commission under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Larry C. HavenerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Daniel Freund v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. LaValley v. First National Bank of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- United States v. HillDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.