Legal Opinion

Yochem v. Gloria, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1938No. 26565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

Was it prejudicially erroneous for the trial court to refuse to submit to the jury the plaintiff’s first cause of action relating to implied warranty?

It is the contention of the plaintiff that this defendant impliedly warranted as reasonably fit for human consumption the water obtained from its own well and served by it to its customers. The defendant seems to place some reliance upon the fact that the well was not drilled by the defendant company but by certain of its incorporators and' stockholders who owned and operated the restaurant before the defendant corporation was organized in 1933.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portage Markets Co. v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. City of Salem v. HardingOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Taugher v. LingOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Aaron Bissinger v. New Country BuffettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  3. Allen v. GraftonOhio Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kurth, Admx. v. KrummeOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API