Allen v. Grafton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTart, J.
This court has held in effect that where, as in the
instant case, a patron of a restaurant orders a meal and it is served to him, there is a sale of what is served by the restaurant to the patron, and, by reason of that portion of the Uniform Sales Act that is now Section 1315.16, Revised Code,1 the operator of the restaurant impliedly warrants that the food is reasonably fit to eat. Yochem v. Gloria, Inc., 134 Ohio St., 427, 17 N. E. (2d), 731. See annotation 7 A. L. R. (2d), 1027, *251and annotation 18 NCCA (NS), 573. We have further held in effect that a violation of our statutes, making it a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Portage Markets Co. v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Norris v. Pig'n Whistle Sandwich Shop Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.