Legal Opinion

Hines v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2008No. 07-2102PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Howard Hines and other similarly situated inmates (Inmates) at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Oak Park Heights in Stillwater, Minnesota (Oak Park Heights Facility), appeal from the district court’s 1 order terminating the Hines Con sent Decree (decree) that regulated prison medical care. We affirm.

I

In 1973, inmates at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater filed a class action suit against Minnesota state actors and prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the medical care provided at the prison violated the Eighth and Fourteenth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gloria Coleman v. Nurse Ruth Rahija, Nurse at Imcc--OakdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Morales Feliciano,et v. John A. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Phelps-Roper v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2010
  3. Sprint Communications Co. v. Elizabeth S. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Horstkotte v. NHDOC, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Kelly v. WenglerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API