Armstrong v. Winter
Supreme Court of Georgia
Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Holden. Wilkes superior court. November 14, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtPish, P. J.
1. “ Iri view of the complicated character of cases generally referred to auditors, and the length of the resulting record, there are specially strong reasons for requiring the strictest compliance with the provisions of the statute that all exceptions shall clearly and distinctly specify the errors complained of.” “ The exception should contain all facts and rulings *870necessary to show harmful error. It should not be so incomplete as to force the court to search through the record to find error.’’ Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637. “These exceptions ought not to refer the court from one part of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Weldon v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Anderson v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Butler, Stevens & Co. v. Georgia & Alabama RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Perkins v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fricker v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- First State Bank v. AveraSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bird v. South Georgia Industrial Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Orr v. CooledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fuqua v. HaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.