Legal Opinion

Bird v. South Georgia Industrial Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1920No. 1544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Registration of land. Before Judge Thomas. Echols superior court. March 11, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

A party to a proceeding under “Tlie Land Registration Act” (Acts 1917, p. 108) filed to tile examiner’s final report an exception as follows: “ Because the finding of the examiner is contrary to law and to the evidence adduced at the hearing of said case,” signed l>y the attorney who then represented the exceptor. This was the only exception filed. At a subsequent regular term of court counsel for opposing parties moved for a dismissal of the exception, on the grounds: “1. Because the exceptions are not separately classified as exceptions of law and exceptions of fact. 2. Because the exceptor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weed v. Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Anderson v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Chatham County v. GaudrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Poullain v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Hilton v. HaynesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Burgess v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Crowell v. AkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Manion v. VarnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API