Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Huff
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided December 19, 2011No. 1:11CV804PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge.
Earlier this year, the North Carolina General Assembly passed the ‘Woman’s Right to Know Act” (“the Act”), 2011 N.C. Sess. Laws 405 (to be codified at N.C. GemStat. §§ 90-21.80 through 90-21.92). The Act is slated to become effective on October 26, 2011. The Plaintiffs — several North Carolina physicians and health care providers — brought this action on behalf of themselves and their patients challenging the constitutionality of parts of the Act.
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ motion asking that a preliminary…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gretchen Stuart v. Janice HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Stuart v. LoomisDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014