Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Loomis
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 17, 2014No. 1:11-CV-804PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge.
In 2011, North Carolina imposed new requirements on health care providers who treat patients seeking abortions. The Woman’s Right to Know Act (“the Act”), codified at N.C. Gen.Stat. §§ 90-21.80 through 90-21.92, sets forth the information physicians and other health care providers1 (hereinafter “providers”) are required to make available to a woman seeking an abortion before she can give informed consent. Another section, the “speech-and-display provision,” requires that the provider perform an ultrasound at least four hours in…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gretchen Stuart v. Paul CamnitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Capital Associated Industries, Inc. v. CooperDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Wash. Post v. McManusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019