Legal Opinion

Closuit v. Mitby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1953No. 35,835PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant are physicians and surgeons. Both practiced in Aitkin. On July 1, 1948, they entered into an oral partnership agreement. Defendant sold to plaintiff a one-half interest in his medical practice, including equipment and property used in the practice and owned by him and excepting his accounts receivable on July 1, 1948, which would be paid within one year and his own personal medical kit. After one year anything that was collected on the old accounts was to be partnership income. Plaintiff paid defendant $8,000 for the one-half interest. Any new equipment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Windey v. North Star Farmers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Culbertson v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Cetkowski v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Imperial Elevator Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marshall Produce Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MikellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Gilles v. SproutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API