Ellis v. NAVAL AIR REWORK FACILITY, ALAMEDA, CAL.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORRICK, District Judge.
In these nine consolidated actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.), minority civilian employees at the Naval Air Rework Facility (NARF) and the Naval Air Station (NAS) in Alameda, California, allege discrimination on the basis of race and sex. Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and defendants Civil Service Commissioners (Commissioners) have moved to be dismissed from the case. For the réasons hereinafter set forth, I certify a class of all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Pauline Danner v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eastland v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Wofford v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Hernandez v. United Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Jones v. BlinzinerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. WaltersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.