Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ho-Chunk Nation Department of Personnel
Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court
Decided December 21, 2006No. CV 05-43PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*373ORDER (Determination upon Remand)
TODD R. MATHA, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On September 21, 2006, the Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court (hereinafter Supreme Court) reversed and remanded a decision that this Court rendered in an employment action. The Supreme Court instructed the Court to conduct further proceedings, which the Court deemed unnecessary since the matter had previously proceeded to trial. The following discussion covers the relevant legal issues neees-sary to appropriately render a decision on remand.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Supreme Court remanded the instant case for proceedings…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. DayHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2008