Legal Opinion
Andrew Mycak v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Federal Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 14, 1992No. 1713, Docket 91-7275PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Andrew Mycak appeals from a summary judgment entered January 31, 1991 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John S. Martin, Jr., Judge, that dismissed his complaint against defendants-appellees Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”) and Honeywell Federal Systems, Inc. (“HFS”). The district court held that Honeywell and HFS did not breach the provisions of an employee handbook that constituted an employment contract with Mycak.
We affirm.
Background
Honeywell hired Mycak in June 1969 as a computer service technician with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gurary v. WinehouseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United Bank Corporation Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Geromanos v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Nisselson v. Wolfson (In Re Wolfson)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.