Barden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Since there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, the one question presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. Defendant argues that she is entitled to the insurance proceeds as a matter of law by virtue of 5 U.S.C. § 8705(a), which, in pertinent part, provides:
The amount of group life insurance and group accidental death insurance in force on an employee at the date of his death shall be paid, on the establishment of a valid claim, to the person or persons surviving at the date of his death, in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- McCord v. SpradlingMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Estate of Hanley v. AndresenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Ward v. StrattonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.