Legal Opinion

Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Morton

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1976No. Appeal, No. 230 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal by James I. Morton from an adjudication of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Morton’s peti*579tion for modification. The issue in this case is whether the referee capriciously disregarded competent evidence. We conclude that he did not and affirm.

Morton was employed by Hays Ordnance (Hays) when he severely injured his left leg in a work-related accident on August 15, 1967. Morton and Hays executed a compensation agreement for total disability and compensation under that agreement continued until October 29,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Holman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hudack v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Schuster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Mountz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API