Legal Opinion

Brumley v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 6, 2003No. 02-11CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

The Government paid plaintiff disability benefits to which he was not entitled. The error occurred because plaintiff misstated his outside income on forms required for benefits under the Federal Employees Compensation Act. Defendant recouped the overpayment years later, from plaintiffs benefits under the same program.

Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that defendant’s offset against his government benefits violated the applicable ten-year statute of limitations. *432Defendant filed a cross-motion for summary-judgment and a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gallo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API