Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Maus v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1956No. 34606Published

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether a party filing a motion for a new trial is entitled to an oral argument in open court in support of such motion.

Relator contends that she is entitled to an opportunity to orally argue the motion for new trial in the Court of Appeals, under authority of Rule III of the Courts of Appeals, which provides:

“No oral argument upon any motion shall occupy longer than 15 minutes on a side, unless the court, for special reasons to he assigned before the hearing, shall extend the time. ’ ’

That rule does not make it mandatory for the court to allow oral argument on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shively v. NicholasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Ticknor v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API