Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Shively v. Nicholas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1949No. 31706PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

A study of th¿ petition of the relatrix discloses that the respondent’s demurrer clearly must be sustained on each of the grounds set forth.

Section 12285, General Code, defining the function of the extraordinary writ of mandamus, provides:

“The writ may require an inferior tribunal to exercise its judgment, or proceed to the discharge of any of its functions, but it cannot control judicial discre tion.” (Italics supplied.)

This statute merely restates the elementary common-law rule and has been followed repeatedly and consistently by this court.

The relatrix is not asking that the respondent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of BotkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State, Ex Rel. Ferguson v. ShoemakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Bargar v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API