Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Board of Councilmen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1885PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The Attorney General applies for a mandamus to compel the respondents to take action upon certain nominations made by the mayor of Detroit of four persons, two being Republicans and two being Democrats, to act as a “ Board of Commissioners of Registration and Election ” for the city of Detroit. Respondents refused to consider the nominations because they regarded the statute which provides for such board as unconstitutional and invalid. To an order to show cause they interpose that ground of defense No other question is of much importance in the case.

The necessity of an immediate decision, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rathbone v. . WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Rogers v. . Common Council of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Jameson v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API