Legal Opinion
Long v. State of S.D.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 2017No. 27381PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKern, Justice
[¶1.] After Landowners prevailed against the State on a claim of inverse condemnation, Landowners requested that the State pay “reasonable attorney, appraisal and engineering fees, and other related costs” pursuant to SDCL 5-2-18 and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, which is codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655 (2012). The circuit court denied their request. Landowners appeal. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
[¶2.] In July 2010, Landowners 1 suffered significant flooding that damaged them real and personal properties. Landowners’ properties are located on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Termination of the Franchise Agreement Between Groseth International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Koopman v. City of EdgemontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Jans v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Matter of Tax Refund of Hunt Cos.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Lapin v. ZeetogroupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.